Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Greenwash news!

Greenwash sweeping USA and invading UK as we read!!!

Green Marketing, Greenwashing and Bitter Eco Villains - What's A Corporation to Do?Source: Adweek, May 12, 2008

Adweek has an interesting article examining environmental corporate social responsibility in light of the latest consumer survey data designed to help companies profit from green marketing. They caution corporations to "realize they're swimming against a turbid current of anti-corporate sentiment. ... This is the backdrop against which greenwashing has become a household word among eco-activists. And it threatens to become part of ordinary consumers' vocabulary as well. ... When you learn that a brand you use" is greenwashing, "it's like getting a holiday card that says a donation has been made in your name to a cause you dislike." On the other hand, a new TNS survey finds what some might call a 'bitter' market segment who do "not respond well to green messaging." These so-called Eco Villians are "predominantly Midwestern, middle-income family-men in small to mid-sized metro areas. Eco Villains do not believe in global warming, disdain eco-conscious products and suspect that environmental media coverage is propaganda."

Source: Washington Post, May 9, 2008
Faced with a national outcry over the high price of gasoline and soaring profits for energy companies, the American Petroleum Institute has launched a multimillion-dollar PR and advertising campaign to cinvince the public that "rising energy prices are not the producers' fault and that government efforts to punish the industry, especially with higher taxes, would only make pricing problems worse," reports Jeffrey H. Birnbaum. Consumer groups such as the Consumer Federation of America are complaining that the industry "is using its outlandish profits to make even more money, and that its advertisements use statistics selectively."

Monday, May 12, 2008

Tough new limits on municiple waste burned..in scotland

Morality’ of Viridor funding bid questioned East Lothian Courier, UK - 17 Apr 2008
Bryan Green questioned the “morality” of Cockenzie and Port Seton Community Council being involved in a request to Viridor for £30000 towards improving the ...Viridor has faced fierce community resistance since announcing proposals for a £140million waste incinerator at Oxwellmains, by Dunbar

Safe Waste in Shropshire - opposed to incineration, anywhere
Viridor withdraws incinerator application/ Veolia to run an MBT plant in Southwark
The link, below, shows an Edinburgh Evening News article from 18 March 2008 saying that Viridor has withdrawn its planning application for a super incinerator near Dunbar in Scotland because of tough new limits laid down by the Scottish Governmentwhich state that no more than 25% of municipal waste can be burned.http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Incinerator--plan--9up.3887947.jp

http://safewasteshrewsbury.blogspot.com/2008/03/veolia-to-run-mbt-plant-in-southwark.html

Other Viridor news,

Viridor buys Howie’s Shore Recycling in £23m deal
The HeraldShore Recycling, the UK’s leading recycler of electric and electronic scrap, has been sold to Viridor Waste Management, part of the Pennon Group, for £23m.
Viridor says WEEE recycling a Shore thing with $24m buy
28 Mar 2008 by jumperhead One WEEE firm, Shore Recycling, has been snapped up by Viridor Waste Management Limited for £23 million this week. According to Viridor, the buy is in line with Viridor’s parent company Pennon Group strategy of expanding its waste ...Greenbang - http://www.greenbang.com - References

Viridor new incinerator bid

Viridor to make new incinerator bid
Eastlothian Today - Dalkeith,Scotland,UK
He said: "In early March, Viridor indicated they were reconsidering their super-incinerator proposal and would re-submit plans at the end of that month. ...

Incinerator is ‘vital for future’expressandstar.com, - 10 May 2008
A new waste incinerator on the edge of Cannock Chase will not make Staffordshire a dumping ground for the West Midlands, according to council bosses. ...

Sunday, May 11, 2008

NEW Welsh nuclear power station appears


A new Welsh nuclear power station appears to have moved a step closer after an energy company bought land around an existing reactor. French firm EDF Energy is understood to have bought farmland around Wylfa, on Anglesey, in anticipation of the Government sanctioning a new station on the island. Western Mail 10th May 2008
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/news/wales-news/2008/05/10/new-welsh-nuclear-power-plant-now-looks-likely-91466-20888993/
But anti-nuclear campaigners have accused the Government of investing in outdated technology, whose safety has come under the microscope again after three studies highlighted possible links to childhood leukaemia.

The most significant of the three new studies was conducted for the German government and published in the International Journal of Cancer and the European Journal of Cancer.
It found a 117% increase in leukaemia among young children living near all 16 large German nuclear facilities between 1980 and 2003.

A second German study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, discovered a threefold increase in leukaemia among children living within five kilometres of the Krümmel nuclear station near Hamburg.

US researchers from the Medical University of South Carolina, analysed the results of 17 studies covering 136 nuclear sites in the UK, Canada, France, the US, Germany, Japan and Spain. Their study was published in the Euro- pean Journal of Cancer Care. They found that children under nine years old, living close to the nuclear sites, suffered a 14 to 21% increase in the rate of leukaemia. Death rates from the disease were also increased by between five and 24%, depending on how close they were to the nuclear plants.

Dylan Morgan, the spokesman for Anglesey-based anti-nuclear group Pawb, said: “Do we really want this type of archaic technology, which belongs to the mid-20th century, when we’re now finding new studies making a strong link between nuclear power stations and childhood leukaemia?.
“Whatever EDF’s ambitions there is still a question mark about whether the people of Wales want this highly dangerous, expensive technology on their doorstep once again.
“We have had to put up with two stations in North-West Wales already (as well as Wylfa the region is also home to the now defunct Trawsfynydd power station).

“We have borne more than our fair share of the nuclear industry so far, and we certainly don’t want another plant here.”

A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Enterprise hinted Anglesey would be among the front runners when it comes to potential locations for new stations and defended nuclear’s safety record.“We have said that new nuclear power stations are likely to be built near or close to existing power stations.“We haven’t put a cap on the number of new stations and it’s for the private sector to decide that.
What have our politicians to say? Not a cheep!! Wales is becoming a dumping ground for controversial projects that no one else wants!

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Greenwash and lies - lobbying unacceptable

News from Europe
use of safe recycled plastics in food packagingThe European Commission has adopted a new regulation to ensure safety of food packaging made of recycled plastics. This new action sets the conditions under which the manufacturers of food contact materials can use recycled plastics.

Write to your MEP about lobbying..corporate self interest is so blatant that there is a need for this to be regulated and people must be aware what is going on!

EU lobbying transparency a step closer but still some way to go
On 25 March 2008, the transparency group Alter-EU has accused the Commission of relying too heavily on business and industry lobbyists when drawing up EU legislation. In reaction, the Commission has said it will publish a list of individual experts who sit on its advisory groups by the summer. But, a European Parliament committee would like the EU to go further and called for a mandatory register of the estimated 15-20,000 lobbyists.
http://www.epha.org/a/2976

Expert Group on ‘Coal combustion, clean and efficient coal technologies, CO2 capture’

The Commission should not be party to a pact with companies in the policy-making arena where corporate self-interest is so obvious. These are companies with a clear profit motivewhen it comes to defining the concept of ‘clean coal’and how it can be developed. This isa hugely controversial environmental and social issue. A truly objective and indeed allroundeffective Expert Group should comprise of a large portion of independent scientists,research institutions, national administrations and environmental groups. These actors,with companies fromthe sector would bemore likely to assess the real capabilities andlimits of the ‘clean coal alternative’as ameans of addressing global warming.The current composition of this Expert Group is not acceptable. The Commission shoulddissolve it and form a new one. The onus is on the Commission to informthe publicabout the role played by this group so far.70
[9]ECCP working group on the integrated approach to reduce CO2 fromlight duty vehicles
All info availlable at:http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/eccp_2/library?l=/light-duty_vehicles/

11]corporate controlled no (commission,member states, ACEA, KAMA, JAMA)Super-visory group of the voluntary commitments of car manufacturers to reduce CO2emissions

[23]coporate controlled Alternative fuels Based on the findings of this study the authorsmake the following recommendations to the European Commission.The European Commission ought to reform the mechanisms by which it accesses expertise. It should ensure such mechanisms are both transparent and operate fairly.For the latter to be the case, different points of viewmust be balanced against oneanother where impartial scientific advice is sought in an atmosphere immune fromcorporate capture. Taking the following steps in relation to the Expert Groups would bea long overduemove in this direction:
1.Disclosure of Expert Groupmembership and key documents;2.Full transparency around the launch of new Expert Groups;3.Open and fair processes around the application for and selection ofmembership;4.Strong safeguards against privileged access and unbalanced composition of these groups;5.Dissolution of all Expert Groups controlled by industry (or any other special interests);6.A broad review on the composition of all Expert Groups by the Commission’sSecretariat General