Showing posts with label prosiect gwyrdd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prosiect gwyrdd. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Prosiect Gwyrdd - unlawful - 25 years of debt

On the day Prosiect Gwyrdd led by Russell Goodway gets the Go ahead for Prosiect Gwyrdd..

South Wales WIN says:
This will prove a very costly day for taxpayers in Cardiff and the other Councils. Max Wallis added "The bureaucrats have forced through a 25-year promise to send wastes for old technology incineration, a dismal 22% efficient in energy terms. Cllr Russell Goodway, Chairman of the Joint Committee is wrong to say they will make significant savings from this project."

Anne Greagsby said "Much of the promised wastes are recyclable materials and we expect that increasingly stricter requirements on recycling will ban burning of them. Like other Councils in England who contracted for excessive tonnages of waste, future councils in Cardiff, Newport, Caerphilly, Monmouth and the Vale of Glamorgan will have to try and escape from this huge long-term burden." 

Response from SNIC:
 "Rob Hepworth, the Bishton-based Chair of Stop Newport and Monmouthshire Incinerator Campaign (SNIC) warned that this was not the end of the story. He said 
" What more can you expect from a cabal of profiteering corporate interests and biased officials  who want to impose waste policies on SE Wales that are at least 20 years out of date ? SNIC believe the decision is illegal as well as perverse. If it is allowed,  we will pay an unacceptable price in terms of  cancer deaths, increased carbon emissions, lower recycling and higher taxes on Newport & Monmouthshire people.”


SNIC Vice Chair Haydn Cullen-Jones of Monmouth added 
“We will  be sending today’s announcement to the European Commission as we believe it constitutes,  unagreed and hence unlawful, state aid to a private, speculative waste incinerator already under construction in Cardiff.  Sadly PG have settled for the next worst solution to landfilling residual waste and guaranteed £400m of taxpayers money into the bargain.
" Monmouthshire is already close to the 2025 70% target for recycling and hence will end up paying more and more per tonne of residual waste for the next 25 years. While incineration in the guise of Energy from Waste is so heavily subsidised, it is no surprise that other more financially and environmentally viable processes have been disregarded."

Contact SNIC - Rob Hepworth  01633 413253 rghepworth@gmail.com

Future future plans for a district heating network are total fantasy as the cost would be enormous  

5% Recycling from bottom ash with no market for use as aggregate for building materials 


Silence on toxic ash - where will it go? 


Produces significant quantities of CO2.


Long-term council contracts to provide waste for incinerators will 


discourage waste reduction, reuse and recycling efforts.



Viridor signs 25-year Prosiect Gwyrdd EfW deal

THE BIG ISSUES
Prosiect Gwyrdd contract with Viridor

Dear Cllr Goodway,
We believe that you as chair of PG take ultimate responsibility for the key financial issues being properly checked prior to signing the huge contract with Viridor.
The answers on two basic financial issues appear to be outstanding  
1. State Aid – the risk of the European Commission ruling the 25% WG subsidy to be illegal has not been accessed by Accounting officers
2. No updated Value-for-Money assessment has been made, neither by the Project or by the WG review.
You should be aware that the National Audit Office has just announced it is investigating three 25-yr incinerator contracts in England www.nao.org.uk/press-releases/defras-oversight-pfi-waste-projects/;
also that Defra withdrew WIC (waste infrastructure credits) last week for the Norfolk CC’s incinerator, putting Norfolk CC in trouble over their recent 25-yr contract  www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/councils/defra-withdraws-ps169m-norfolk-efw-funding
You may have seen that EdF yesterday specified the State Aid issue as needing a decision before they sign the Hinkley Point nuclear deal.
We question that the Project officers are capable of giving appropriate advice on these issues and suggest appropriate independent experts should be consulted, eg. the WAO who are already considering the PG contract.
From Cardiff Against the Incinerator CATI 

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

To Russell Goodway re Prosiect Gwyrdd contract with Viridor

Prosiect Gwyrdd contract with Viridor

Dear Cllr Goodway,
We believe that you as chair of PG take ultimate responsibility for the key financial issues being properly checked prior to signing the huge contract with Viridor.
The answers on two basic financial issues appear to be outstanding  
1. State Aid – the risk of the European Commission ruling the 25% WG subsidy to be illegal has not been accessed by Accounting officers
2. No updated Value-for-Money assessment has been made, neither by the Project or by the WG review.
You should be aware that the National Audit Office has just announced it is investigating three 25-yr incinerator contracts in England www.nao.org.uk/press-releases/defras-oversight-pfi-waste-projects/;
also that Defra withdrew WIC (waste infrastructure credits) last week for the Norfolk CC’s incinerator, putting Norfolk CC in trouble over their recent 25-yr contract  www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/councils/defra-withdraws-ps169m-norfolk-efw-funding
You may have seen that EdF yesterday specified the State Aid issue as needing a decision before they sign the Hinkley Point nuclear deal.
We question that the Project officers are capable of giving appropriate advice on these issues and suggest appropriate independent experts should be consulted, eg. the WAO who are already considering the PG contract.
From Cardiff Against the Incinerator CATI 


Letter to Russell Goodway but no reply
Prosiect Gwyrdd contract with Viridor

Dear Cllr Goodway,
We believe that you as chair of PG take ultimate responsibility for the key financial issues being properly checked prior to signing the huge contract with Viridor.
The answers on two basic financial issues appear to be outstanding  
1. State Aid – the risk of the European Commission ruling the 25% WG subsidy to be illegal has not been accessed by Accounting officers
2. No updated Value-for-Money assessment has been made, neither by the Project or by the WG review.
You should be aware that the National Audit Office has just announced it is investigating three 25-yr incinerator contracts in England www.nao.org.uk/press-releases/defras-oversight-pfi-waste-projects/;
also that Defra withdrew WIC (waste infrastructure credits) last week for the Norfolk CC’s incinerator, putting Norfolk CC in trouble over their recent 25-yr contract  www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/councils/defra-withdraws-ps169m-norfolk-efw-funding
You may have seen that EdF yesterday specified the State Aid issue as needing a decision before they sign the Hinkley Point nuclear deal.
We question that the Project officers are capable of giving appropriate advice on these issues and suggest appropriate independent experts should be consulted, eg. the WAO who are already considering the PG contract.
From Cardiff Against the Incinerator CATI 

Thursday, October 10, 2013

viridor on trial 2-day emergency hearing at Cardiff High Court in December.

High Court judge rules for CATI
We win our long delayed application for an emergency hearing!  
Judge Curran agreed that Pauline Ellaway  is a 'standard bearer' for many other members of the public who are deeply concerned about the incinerator development.
He ordered an emergency full hearing of Ms Ellaway's case at which all issues will be considered.
The Judge said “the actions of Viridor in the first place in proceeding to begin works prematurely, as they did, and of the council in protesting only after being prompted by CATI, and then effectively condoning such conduct” raise issues of “procedural propriety”.
CATI is pleased that the Judge ruled the Hearing should cover most of our points, though not the failure to consider impacts om the Severn Estuary (Habitats Directive assessment).
Dave Prosser of CATI said: “the judge slapped down the Council's assertion that our objections were 'unarguable'. Their planning committee had the legal case before them at their meeting in February, but led by their chair Cllr Michael Michael, failed to seek proper advice before they dismissed it, deciding then to risk public money on a court case”.
Max Wallis of CATI added:
“The judge has knocked another hole in Cardiff Council's plan to sign a contract with Viridor, with the High Court judge finding the company acted unlawfully in starting building works last July, action that Cardiff Council condoned by refusing to stop it.  It's a further reason for the five Councils in Prosiect Gwyrdd to question the £600million 25-year contract to incinerate excessive tonnages of waste.”
------------------------------------------------
We expect the case will go for a 2-day emergency hearing at Cardiff High Court in December.
Cllr Michael Michael (chair of Planning cttee) exposed himself in the Echo on 3rd October, railing against legal aid funding.  See our answer on cardiffagainsttheincinerator.blogspot.com and (hopefully) in the Echo or walesonline.co.uk letters.
Max Wallis   07714163254 - on behalf of CATI
Note that we continue to meet on Mondays in the Old Illts club, Splott Bridge.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Cardiff Planning cmte Shambles over Viridor Incinerator


Cardiff Planning cmte Shambles over Viridor Incinerator

Today  13th Feb. at 2.30pm Cardiff Council planning committee considers over 6 months late a dozen applications to approve or reject Viridor's incinerator.  
Rob Griffiths, chair of CATI, will say to the Planning Cttee:
“This is further evidence of what a complete shambles council  policy is. They have a Court action against them for failure to act over 6 months against Viridor's unlawful construction of an incinerator. The High Court legal action is to kick off in two weeks."
Cardiff Council will have to face up to the fact sooner or later that Viridor have been quite prepared to proceed without proper authority and contrary to planning regulations… and utter contempt for the views of local residents and businesses about the economic and health detriment.."

Adventurers Quay Management Company Limited and the 226 residents who live there.have written to County Hall today expressing support for Cardiff Against the Incinerator

Friday, December 14, 2012

Prosiect Gwyrdd charges £110 MORE a tonne to burn our rubbish

CARDIFF COUNCIL TO PAY £166 A TONNE while other Councils pay only £56

Prosiect Gwyrdd Rip off to pay far over the going price for Waste Incineration.

CARDIFF COUNCIL TO PAY £166 A TONNE while other Councils pay only  £56 
and to pay this rip off price for 25 years!

Prosiect Gwyrdd (Project Green) rip off applies to all partnership councils  
  1. Cardiff Council, 
  2. Caerphilly County Borough Council, 
  3. Monmouthshire County Council, 
  4. Newport City Council and 
  5. Vale of Glamorgan Council.
The official survey by WRAP - 2012 Gate Fees Report *- finds that
the median gate fee for energy-from-waste incineration is £65 per
tonne The lowest PFI-type incinerator contract has gate fee of 
£56 /tonne In comparison PG calculated a 25-contract based 
on 2010 cost levels of £36.6 Million for 220 000 tonnes 
supplied to the incinerator (transport costs borne by 
the Councils). This means they were ready to pay £166 
per tonne.

Why did PG think that was a good deal?  Not just that they 
wanted an incinerator built in South Wales, but it was 
based on PFI-costs in England, which have high bank
 charges.  Their scheme would rip-off Council 
taxpayers and provide cut-price capacity for 
businesses at similar rates to those reported by WRAP
Face of Prosiect Gwyrdd
Ian Loyd Davis

Prosiect Gwyrdd excuse the
25 yr-long contract by saying
 we get a better price! 
The officers even guessed 
a 10-yr contract would be 
twice the price, before 
the WRAP figures came 
out.  The evidence of 
these figures is of a 
worse price. Former PG
Steering Cttee member, 
Caerphilly's Colin Mann, 
recently repeated this, 
so did he ever ask for evidence? Seems cllrs are 
being severely  'mislead' by Prosiect Gwyrdd people. 

No wonder Viridor is so keen to build an incinerator/gold 
mine in Cardiff and Veolia trying to build in Newport

The PG comparative cost per tonne is available f
rom the annual 25% subsidy (index-linked )
 approved by WAG of £9.124M in April 2009 
(based on secret OBC ‘Health Check’ figures of 2010),
 making £36.5M total. For the 220 000t pa, this gives
 £166 per tonne, higher than the maximum £131/t 
for new PFI-incinerators given below.  WRAP warns
 that the £166 /t gate fee for PG may not be directly
 comparable with those at older incinerators
 (£32 - £101 /t).  Still £166 /t compares badly with 
comparison with Defra-agreed PFI schemes of 
£56-102 /t (median £76 /t).
EfW                 Pre-2000 facilities                   £64  median                            £32 to £75 range 
 Post-2000 facilities                 £82                                          £44 to £101
                         Defra Gate fee data [9]
             <200kt nbsp="nbsp" span="span" to="to">
  200kt to 300kt                       £76                                          £56 to £102
                         350kt to 450kt                        £68                                          £57 to £78
 [9]  Defra information on PPP/PFI projects that have reached contract closure in the last 5 years or are about to reach contractual close in the next 12 months.
*Download the full report - WRAP Gate Fees Report 2012

The Gate Fees report aims to raise price transparency and, 
through improving the flow of information, enhance the
 efficiency with which the waste management market
 operates.  A lack of market information may reduce a 
local authority's ability to make informed decisions on
 waste management options in terms of both economic
 and environmental costs.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Urgent Notice to Cardiff Residents – New Consultation on Viridor Incinerator

Urgent Notice to Cardiff Residents – New Consultation on Viridor Incinerator 


You may have seen the Public Notices that appeared in Splott and Cardiff Bay recently. Viridor's Incinerator development is now at a critical stage. Thanks to pressure from Cardiff-Against-the-Incinerator, Cardiff Council are now complying with planning law and consulting residents on legally-binding conditions set out in the planning permission.

This letter contains CATI's advice on how to respond to the consultation. Because of the conditions on the consultation, the Council will disregard direct challenges to the overall planning permission, but we argue for being tough on the conditions.

We suggest you object on some of the following points:

1. The Consultation is difficult to understand and poorly publicised. Cardiff Council were found guilty of “maladministration” in previous public consultation on the incinerator. You can complain the Council have done little better in informing the public this time.

2. Viridor started development of the incinerator on July 20th, the day after their new application was published! This is a breach of planning law.  Say Viridor's actions show they cannot be trusted to build and run the incinerator in accordance with the law.

3. The site is still contaminated from its previous occupants. Conditions 3 and 4 of the planning permission says Viridor should have cleaned it up, but they haven't. You can object that Viridor's “report on remediation”, which proposes no clean-up in advance, is inadequate. Object too, to their plan to simply throw away soil they dig up rather than process and re-use it.

4. Issues around the thousands of tonnes of toxic incinerator ash are unresolved. The plan is to process the toxic “bottom ash” at the incinerator building – this contradicts planning condition 23, which forbids them to process hazardous waste. Object that this contradiction means the plant cannot operate, so the whole planning permission should be declared null and void!

5. The incinerator site is on a flood plain. Extreme storm conditions are becoming worse and more frequent, making the “100 year” flood prediction inadequate. You can say the real flood-risk should be considered under Condition 11 – especially since the toxic ash stockpile could become flooded and spread widely over the surrounding area.

6. The conditions don't solve “satisfactorily” the inadequacies and contradictions in the planning consent (Echo 25 July). Say the Council must force a stop to construction work.

Feel free to select from these points and to add others. Help us demand that the Council make Viridor comply with the law!

Your local Councillors can provide you with further help, but responses need to be in the hands of Cardiff Council by 14th August to Development Manager, City Hall CF10 3ND].
E-responses to developmentmanagement@cardiff.gov.uk; view documents on-line (no easy read!) at http://planning.cardiff.gov.uk/online-applications/ ref. 10/00149/E, Trident Park.

---------------------- cardiffagainsttheincinerator@gmail.com ------------------ 1 August 2012 -------------------
phone: 07947 214169 or 07817 513610 ---- http://cardiffagainsttheincinerator.blogspot.com/

Monday, March 28, 2011

Call for Plaid to stand up against Incinerator ambitions driving Waste Policy in Wales

South Wales WIN lobbied the Plaid conference this weekend - read media coverage here Campaigners urge Plaid Cymru to uphold election pledge on incinerators


WASTE - A BURNING ISSUE
Time for Plaid to stand up against Incinerator ambitions driving Waste Policy in Wales
Plaid’s 2010 election manifesto is clear – 80% recycling/composting by 2020 plus opposition to waste incinerators. So let’s see Plaid condemning WAG’s rotten targets and its subsidies for incinerators –the £9 million/yr for Prosiect 'Gwyrdd' means £30-40million/yr throughout Wales.
Reality of Poor recycling targets and drive to mega-incinerators
WAG’s bias to incineration - subsidising gate fees and promoting regional consortia for 'residual' waste - is stronger than in England or Scotland.   Contrary to Jane Davidson’s ‘green’ claims, there are no ambitious recycling targets in Wales are not ambitious. Only 70% recycling, or 65% excluding incinerator ash, not the 80-90% judged feasible. 75% is already reached in Flanders etc. 70% by 2015 is practicable, but WAG defers it till 2025 !
The 5-county Prosiect 'Gwyrdd' is leading WAG's drive for privatisation of waste in Wales, with a projected value of £1.1 billion over 25 years. The 4 chosen companies to bid for 25-year PFI contract are Covanta/Brig y Cwm; Viridor/Cardiff; Waste Recycling Group Ltd/Barry; Veolia ES Aurora Ltd/Newport, all variants of incinerators pretending to be ‘energy’ plants. Two claim to be CHP, providing some heat as well as energy, but don't qualify as they will use little of the heat and hardly reach half the 60% energy efficiency set in Wales.
Their 'Design, Build, Finance and Operate' arrangement is a version of PFI, the disreputable Private Finance Initiative. Prosiect Gwyrdd’s Chair (Lib-Dem Cllr Stephens) claimed it’s only a PPP (private-public partnership) yet “financing for the Project will be predominantly, if not wholly, procured from private finance.”
WAG recruited Howel Jones from Partnerships UK – promoter of Blair-Brown’s PFIs – to cajole and bribe all Welsh councils into similar waste projects. Private companies taking over waste management in Wales was a ‘new’ Labour agenda.
Why oppose the incineration of household waste?
The principal purpose is ‘disposal’ and the 5 counties’ declared plan for 35% incineration means reduced efforts for recycling/composting
Far from helping to 'tackle climate change', burning more rubbish produces far more carbon emissions (eg. from oil-based plastics) than it saves through electricity generation. Cardiff proposes to ignore incinerator CO2 by calling it ‘industrial’, so maintaining ‘green’ pretensions
The ‘business case’ relied on exaggerating future quantities of waste. Waste PFIs need guaranteed amounts of waste per week and they assumed waste tonnages will grow over the years to offset increased recycling.
Poses health risks with toxic emissions and huge tonnages of hazardous ash sent to landfill – with special low rate of landfill tax.
WAG's policy claims to be technology-neutral, yet
# they require the 25-year contracts, Private Finance model, with an incinerator as “reference technology”.
# force authorities to choose mega-waste companies and squeeze out Welsh businesses
# it’s part of the privatisation agenda, that has proved highly costly.
 
The alternatives to incineration are cheaper, more flexible, quicker to implement and better for the environment. Rather than incinerating waste, the best option is to reduce residual waste to a minimum, through more intensive recycling and sorting. WAG’s own consultant’s report shows 80% recycling is more economic than the 70% they chose, as well as being more ‘sustainable’. Prof. Paul Connett, the leading exponent of the ‘zerowaste’ movement, on a recent visit, condemned WAG’s policy.

P Gwyrdd ignores risks
locked into a 25-year private finance contract, even more expensive since the credit crunch
incinerator ash will be classed as 'hazardous waste', with high costs of treatment or disposal
penalties will be attached to the huge amounts of CO2 emitted by incinerators.

We call on Plaid Cymru tob continue to oppose the use of waste incinerators, disguised as Energy-from-Waste (EfW) urgently demand a independent review of the value-for-money of private finance
demand disclosure of full information, over-riding excuses of commercial confidentiality
Call Plaid Cllrs in Cardiff and Caerphilly to account for supporting Prosiect 'Gwyrdd'
Expose the greenwash of incineration by WAG’s “Waste Awareness Wales”

Stick to 2010 Plaid’s Westminster Manifesto
“We will continue to oppose the use of waste incinerators and support binding targets for waste prevention. We support recycling targets of 80% of domestic waste by 2020 and the introduction of a higher landfill tax. We will campaign for changes in public procurement legislation so that Local Authorities can favour materials from recycled and local sources”.


2008: Conference further calls:
On the Assembly Government to work with all local authorities across Wales to promote a consistent and standardized approach to waste management which takes recognition of the fact that recovery of energy from waste is fullest through maximising recycling including that of plastics, and the separate collection and anaerobic digestion of food way genste; and that, by contrast, incineration is a bad solution, inefficient in energy generation, and damaging to the environment and climate change

South Wales WIN, http://southwaleswin.com/ affiliated to UK Without Incineration Network (WUKWIN)
email southwaleswin@gmail.com
Strangely the lib dems attack Plaid on supporting inconeration when they too support it and chair the joint committee. More here

Cllrs on P Gwyrdd Joint Committtee where tories CALL THE SHOTS!!
Strange bed fellows! 2 Plaid 2 lib Dems 6 Tories
http://www.caerphilly.gov.uk/prosiectgwyrdd/english/joint_committee.html

Lyn Ackerman Plaid Cymru Caerphilly
Colin Mann Plaid Cymru Caerphilly
Margaret Jones Lib Dems Cardiff
Mark Stephens Lib Dems Cardiff
Philip Murphy Tory Monmouthshire
S B Jones Tory Monmouthshire bryanjones@monmouthshire.gov.uk
William Routley Tory Newport
David Fouweather Tory Newport
Cllr Geoffrey A. Cox Tory Vale of Glamorgan
Gordon C. Kemp Tory Vale of Glamorgan

Campaigners urge Plaid Cymru to uphold election pledge on incinerators


CAMPAIGNERS today were due to urge Plaid Cymru to stick to its election promise to oppose massive waste incineration schemes in South Wales.

The South Wales WithoutŠIncinerationŠNetwork (WIN) is pressing AMs, councillors and activists not to abandon their 2010 pledge to oppose the Prosiect Gwyrdd programme, which has won support from the Welsh Assembly Government.

The £1.1bn project privately funded over 25 years could, says WIN, see multiple incinerators built in South Wales, while WAG’s target to recycle 70% of rubbish by 2023 falls short of a possible 80% to 90% recycled.

A spokesman, speaking as Plaid Cymru holds its conference at Cardiff’s Wales Millennium Centre, argued: “Plaid’s 2010 election manifesto is clear – 80% recycling and composting by 2020 and opposing the use of waste incinerators.

“It’s high time Plaid condemned WAG’s rotten targets with subsidies for incinerators.“Shoving more waste up a chimney and spewing toxic emissions into the air will undermine recycling, not increase it.”

WIN also insists incineration poses public health risks with toxic emissions and huge amounts of hazardous ash sent to landfill.

It wants Plaid to oppose all waste incinerators and demand an independent review of PFI projects such as Prosiect Gwyrdd with much fuller information about them.

Independent Caerphilly councillor Anne Blackman said: “We in Europe are being hoodwinked into paying millions in subsidy to process valuable waste that’s dealt with for free or paid for by the collectors in Canada and Africa.

“These plants could put deposits that are smaller than soot into the air that might affect more people than coal dust did in the mining industry.

“We need our public health and environmental professionals to examine incineration proposals and provide scientific and medical evidence about its effect on public health.

“We need to see the evidence and have a public debate – not just foist this onto our great-grandchildren for the next 25 years.”

A spokeswoman for Plaid Cymru said: “Plaid’s commitment is to overhauling planning policy so that decisions in relation to waste can be made close to the people and serve the needs of communities.

“Local people need to have a voice in that process.

“We are also committed to working with universities and industry to find new ways to deal with non-recyclable waste.

“Ultimately, of course, this is a decision for local authorities. Plaid’s sustainability spokesperson Leanne Wood recently reaffirmed Plaid’s opposition to incineration, and questioned the Environment Minister on the Welsh Government’s subsidy to Prosiect Gwyrdd in the Assembly chamber.”
WAG declined to comment given the forthcoming election.
Read More http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2011/03/26/campaigners-urge-plaid-cymru-to-uphold-election-pledge-on-incinerators-91466-28405958/#ixzz1HshCYMjU



























Friday, March 25, 2011

Time Plaid to condemn subsidy for £1.1bn incinerator PFI

South Wales Without Incineration Network will be lobbying the Plaid conference on Sat 26th March  against WAGs funding for incineration and Plaid Councillors in power in Caerphilly and Cardiff promoting incineration and PFI totally against Plaid Policy. 
WASTE A BURNING ISSUE Time for PLAID TO STAND UP against Incinerator Ambitions Driving Waste Policy in Wales 
Reality of Poor recycling targets and drive to mega-incinerators

Plaid’s 2010 election manifesto is clear – 80% recycling/composting by 2020 & oppose the use of waste incinerators. High Time for Plaid to condemn WAG’s rotten targets with subsidies for incinerators - £9 million/yr for Prosiect 'Gwyrdd'
Contrary to Jane Davidson’s ‘green’ claims, there are no ambitious recycling targets in Wales. Only 70% recycling, or 65% excluding incinerator ash, not the 80-90% judged feasible, with 75% already met in Flanders etc. Not by 2015 as is quite practicable, but deferred till 2025(!)
WAG bias to incineration - both subsidy and promoting regional consortia for 'residual' waste - is stronger than either England or Scotland.  
The 5-county Prosiect 'Gwyrdd'/Incinerator  is leading WAG's drive for privatisation of waste in Wales, with a projected value of £1.1 billion over 25 years. The 4 chosen companies to bid for 25-year PFI contract are Covanta/Brig y Cwm; Viridor/Cardiff; Waste Recycling Group Ltd/Barry; Veolia ES Aurora Ltd/Newport, all variants of incinerators disguised as energy plants. Two claim to be CHP, provide heat and as well as energy but don't qualify as they will use little of the Heat and under half the 60% energy efficiency set in Wales.
 Their 'Design, Build, Finance and Operate' arrangement is a version of PFI,the disreputable Private Finance Initiative. Chair (Lib Dem Cllr Stephens) claimed it’s only a PPP (private-public partnership) yet “financing for the Project will be predominantly, if not wholly, procured from private finance.”
WAG recruited Howel Jones from Partnerships UK – promoter of Blair-Brown’s PFIs – to cajole and bribe all Welsh councils into similar waste projects.
Why oppose the incineration of household waste?
  • Shoving more waste up a chimney and spewing toxic emissions into the air will undermine recycling, not increase it
  • Far from helping to 'tackle climate change', burning more rubbish produces far more carbon emissions (eg. from oil-based plastics) than it saves through electricity generation. WAG pretend incinerator CO2 can be ignored by calling it ‘industrial’, so maintaining ‘green’ pretensions
  • Relies on exaggerating future quantities of waste instead of strongly increased recycling and composting. Waste PFIs need guaranteed amounts of waste per week & assume waste tonnages will grow over the length of the contract.
  • Poses health risks with toxic emissions and huge tonnages of hazardous ash sent to landfill
WAG's policy claims to be technology-neutral, yet

  • The Private Finance trap locks us into 25-year contracts
  • forces authorities to choose mega-waste companies and squeeze out Welsh businesses
The alternatives to incineration are cheaper, more flexible, quicker to implement and better for the environment. Rather than incinerating waste, The best option is to reduce residual waste to a minimum, through more intensive recycling and sorting.
P Gwyrdd/Incinerator ignores risks
  • locked into PFI they call 'Design, Build, Finance and Operate' capital funding which relies too heavily on banks and more expensive since credit crunch
  • incinerator ash will be classed as 'hazardous waste', with high costs of treatment or disposal penalties will be attached to the huge amounts of CO2 emitted by incinerators.
We call on Plaid Cymru to
  • continue to oppose the use of waste incinerators even when called EfW
  • urgently demand a independent review of the value for money case of private finance when interest margins which financiers now demand on PFI projects are higher and likely to stay at elevated levels.
  • Ask whether the disclosure of commercial information about the project is adequate and whether more information could be put in the public domain without endangering commercial confidentiality
  • Stop Plaid Cllrs in power in Cardiff and Caerphilly supporting Prosiect 'Gwyrdd'/Incinerator
  • Stop the Greenwash and stick to reality
Stick to 2010 Plaid’s Westminster Manifesto
“We will continue to oppose the use of waste incinerators and support binding targets for waste prevention. We support recycling targets of 80% of domestic waste by 2020 and the introduction of a higher landfill tax. We will campaign for changes in public procurement legislation so that Local Authorities can favour materials from recycled and local sources”.
2008: Conference further calls:
On the Assembly Government to work with all local authorities across Wales to promote a consistent and standardized approach to waste management which takes recognition of the fact that recovery of energy from waste is fullest through maximising recycling including that of plastics, and the separate collection and anaerobic digestion of food waste; and that, by contrast, incineration is a bad solution, inefficient in energy generation, and damaging to the environment and climate change.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Clive Bates WAG Spin Doc

Clive Bates started as Director General for Sustainable Futures at the Welsh Assembly Government in March 2009, and paid £130k pa to front letters to the local press! ** Let’s recover energy from our waste letters to South Wales Echo Jan 20 2011 "IN THE interests of an open, honest conversation about how we deal with our rubbish..... "

Clive Bates CV coming through Greenpeace to become an apparachik, now declaring waste-to-energy is “best” ? *1990s worked for Greenpeace on energy and climate change, then became Director of ASH
* 2003 to Tony Blair's strategy unit
* 2005 head of environment policy at the Env AgencyRecently in 2010 became"Director General Sustainable Development" WAG. This grand title denotes the recent new layer of civil servants – Wales has appointed three @ £130k salary.
How does a guy with Greenpeace pedigree and understanding greenhouse gas complexities come to endorse the incineration industry line – that burning waste helps “to tackle climate change” in the local paper (S W Echo, 20 January**)? He repeats another canard: “energy from waste installations are regulated to stringent European standards, including those related to health” which of course comes from an Environment Agency blind to nanoparticles.

Monday, January 31, 2011

P Gwyrdd PFI Scam devised by Pro-Incinerator officers

PROSIECT GWYRDD SHORT-LIST
P Gwyrdd is a scam devised by pro-incinerator officers in S-E Wales to pretend to be seeking a “technology neutral” solution to municipal waste.
  •  they brought in Partnerships UK as financial consultants – whose remit is promoting PFI. Because PFI has a bad press and was caught in the credit crunch, it has been re-badged as PBFOM.
  •  they devised their reference project as a single incinerator, requiring a 25-30 year-long contract and high waste volumes, so the Councils are going slow on recycling (65% by 2025 though other authorities are already reaching or surpassing 70%)
  •  they pretend all the incinerator grate-ash can be re-used as aggregate, those elsewhere it's found to be toxic material and less than half is re-used.
  • WAG promised them 25% subsidy on the gate fee to the incinerator company. WAG again claims to be technology neutral, but disclosed in the media that energy-recovery from waste is “best” see below
  •  WAG claimed it wanted high energy efficiency, 60% or more, using all the waste heat. But their subsidy is promised irrespective of the heat-use, implying their claim is dishonest.
  •  The short-list of 4 companies announced by 'scam' Gwyrdd in December contained only large single incinerator projects, with little if any use of heat (the Veolia plan would supply a small fraction for injdustrial purposes to Solutia).
More details are in the briefing by R Walters member of Abergavenny & Crickhowell FOE (Friends of the Earth) [link]

When applied to incinerators, "energy from waste" is a dangerous euphemism. Far from being a sensible, environmentally friendly solution to the enormous amount of waste created in Wales, incineration is a nasty quick fix to deal with our ever-growing waste mountain.
The news that a 400m waste plant planned for Wales Jan 04 2011 to build one of the UK’s largest waste incineration plants on the outskirts of Merthyr Tydfil is shocking.
This is an Energy from waste CON.
WAG under pressure to reduce landfill are opting for incineration of waste under the pretext that they can make electricity from the process! We know the electricity from one of these large incinerators is pretty small, compared with normal power stations (several 100MW up to Aberthaw’s 1450MW) and produces toxic ash and air pollution. They set no requirement on energy efficiency, despite Welsh strategy on 60% minimum.
Claims that significant energy could generated from waste are wrong - even Covanta's huge Merthyr proposal would generate a tiny 60MW compared with Aberthaw's 1450 MW.
WAGs and Cardiff Councils are Re-branding incineration as a means of recovery rather than waste disposal to create the impression that burning our rubbish is environmentally-friendly, which it clearly is not.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Cardiff Against the Incinerator action today in Cardiff and Newport


Join the action today....
On Tuesday Cardiff Against the Incinerator is taking action in two locations - we will lobby the Environment Agency again at the 
National Museum Park Place Cardiff on Tuesday 7th Sept from 12:30-1:30

Cardiff Against the Incinerator will 
also have a presence in Newport from 11am to 2pm in John Frost Square, in support of the Newport campaign against incineration & combustion plants which are being planned in the city.

The planned BioGen incinerator in Newport and the planned Viridor incinerator in Cardiff are both part of the same scheme, Prosiect Gwyrdd, which is pursuing hazardous and environmentally-unsound solutions to South Wales' waste problem while ignoring the wishes of the general public. Similar schemes are being pursued in Merthyr Tydfil, Barry and Flintshire.

Scientific evidence shows an association between living within 3km of an incinerator and an increased risk of cancers, particularly liver cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. Prosiect Gwyrdd, a consortium of Newport, Cardiff, Vale of Glamorgan, Caerphilly and Monmouthshire councils, meanwhile, is ignoring science in favour of industry propaganda and documents which the Royal Society describe as "misleading".

Cardiff Against the Incinerator offers solidarity to other local campaigns against environmentally unsound waste solutions in support of a united, working-class movement across Wales and Britain. It is a member of the UK Without Incineration Network.
Contact:Edmund Schluessel, campaign secretary 07947 214169
cardiffagainsttheincinerator@ gmail.com twitter: @nocardiffburner

some of our recent campaign coverage ...

Protest over incinerator plans


WalesOnline - 25 Aug 2010
They claim the people of Cardiff should have been consulted about the plans to buildincinerators. Catherine Pleace, a teacher from Splott said: “There is ...

Incinerator plan comes under fire


Morning Star Online - 26 Aug 2010
Cardiff Against the Incinerator activists staged a protest in nearby Penarth, where there was a travelling display van run by the council to promote the ...

New deadline on incinerator views

BBC News - ‎Aug 31, 2010‎
The deadline has been extended for people to give their views about the granting of an environmental permit for a £150m waste incinerator. ...

Splott incinerator consultation period extended

WalesOnline - ‎Aug 31, 2010‎
The Environment Agency has extended the time for people to give their comments about the Viridor incinerator. The consultation period was due to end on ...

Environment Agency extend consultation on Viridor draft permit

The Guardian - ‎Aug 31, 2010‎
Environment Agency Wales has agreed to extend the consultation time limit on their draft decision for the Viridor waste incinerator plant following pressure ...